Categories

I am reading

Prelude to Foundation (The Foundation Series)
Prelude to Foundation (The Foundation Series)

Contact Me

If you'd like to let me know what you think of the blog you can contact me here

Never going hungry in December

It’s a pretty obvious time of the year to write about food. December is the one month of the year where I barely need to go to the supermarket. As long as I have some fruit or milk or muesli to have for breakfast, all of the other meals seem to take care of themselves. It could be work parties, catching up with friends, family, lunch in the shopping centre food court as a break from the obligatory Christmas shopping, Christmas Day, the leftovers from Christmas Day… I never go hungry in December.

But other people do. This year, approximately 1.02 billion people were chronically hungry, about 15% of the estimated world population. This is up a staggering 166 million people from three years ago. The majority, of course, are in developing countries.

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) defines chronic hunger as undernourishment. This generally covers protein-energy malnutrition which is the lack of protein and energy provided by the basic food groups. This undernourishment affects people’s ability to do basic physical activities such as work and study. Undernourished children grow slower physically and mentally than other children, and they have weaker immune systems. Undernourished mothers give birth to undersized and weak babies.

The average necessary daily intake is regarded as 1800 kcal per day. In McDonald’s terms, that’s about a large Quarter Pounder Meal and a McFlurry.

From 1969 to 2004 the proportion of the population of developing countries who suffered from chronic hunger had been falling steadily, from almost 35% of the population in 1969 to just over 15% in 2004. This coincided with a general decrease in the number of hungry people over the same period, from about 875 million to 850 million. The decreases in percentage and actual number are not proportional, likely because better nutrition meant that less people died from malnutrition.

But since 2004, both trends have begun reversing. From a low point of around 16% in 2004, the percentage of people in developing countries who are undernourished in 2009 is nearing 20%. In percentage terms the increase may seem to be not that bad (or not as bad as it could be) but in real terms, in numbers of people, the increase has been astronomical, especially in the last twelve months.

When I read figures and learn things like this, I am constantly at a loss what to do It’s such an obvious deficiency in the world. I’m no expert in this area (or any other for that matter) but you’d think that if there were easy answers, they would have been found and implemented by now. Through a cursory search it seems that the world produces around 1.5 times the food we actually need, and that most people who are undernourished live in countries which have food surpluses rather than deficits. The problem would appear to be that the people can’t afford to buy the food they need.

Yesterday, Christmas Day, I ate way too much food. I’m probably not alone there. I am also a pretty hefty eater, and a little overweight. I’ve felt crap and figuratively beat myself up about my weight and eating habits before. I’ve tried a number of the methods under the sun for cutting down on both, but none to date have been long-term solutions. But maybe something like eating less and sending the money I save to an organisation addressing hunger could do the trick. Good for the body, good for the soul? It’s worth a try.

Apologies for getting all self-reflective and soppy at the end there.

Japanese Performance Art at the Carriageworks

7-550x825Just returned from a good feed at the Parramatta Roxy with my Wednesday Night Dinner Crew. As you might have guessed from our name, we meet on Wednesday nights for dinner. A couple of weeks ago two Crew members were unable to come because they had free tickets to the Kirin Big In Japan event at the Carriageworks in Redfern, Sydney.

From the sounds of things it was a whole lot of Japanese performance artists doing stuff. Like the guy who played guitar while a machine painted onto a canvas in response to his music. About halfway through the song the paint machine broke and stopped painting, so another guy came and picked up the brush and continued painting.

It sounds absolutely riveting, and I know you as well as I would have been overwhelmed by the level of profundity. From all reports, the Inner City Chic Crowd were totally engaged with the performance works and lapped it all up with furrowed-brow seriousness. I really wish I could have seen the dudes with electrodes attached to their faces.

Another performance that sounded unmissable was a music act called Trippple Nippples. There are many fine photos of these Japanese ladies I could share which could give some sense of just how solid they are. I hear on Wednesday they were using gaffer tape as a bra. Maybe like in this video?

And here’s a sample of their music. My friends from the Wednesday Night Dinner Crew said they were having trouble not laughing throughout the event. The main reason they didn’t was because everyone around them seemed to be taking it all so seriously.

Now I’m quite a fan of performance in many shapes and forms, but I really struggle to find words to describe things like this other than ’self-indulgence’.  It strikes me that the people who take this stuff so seriously must be completely out of touch with anything resembling reality. And the fact that these people are Sydney’s in-scene fills me not so much with horror as dismay.

I have no doubt that there are many fine performance artists out there. But I doubt they’ll be found at events put on by beer companies.

The NSW Premiers we didn’t vote for

The leadership spill in NSW last week which ended up with Kristina Keneally replacing Nathan Rees has brought up a problem that I have with Australia’s political system: someone can become the leader of a government without being voted for by the people.

225px-kristina_keneally

KKK - NSW's new Premier

I know that technically, when we vote in a lower house election we’re voting for the local representative of a particular party, and if enough people in the area vote for that person they become the representative of that area.  If, across the country, enough representatives of a particular party win the local elections, that party forms a government, and the leader of that party, as chosen by the elected representatives, becomes the leader of that government.

That’s all well and good in theory, and some people may vote for whoever they think will be best for their area, regardless of which party they come from, but I believe the majority of people vote that way. When people are considering who to vote for (assuming of course that they do actually think about it and don’t just vote for who their mummy and daddy told them to) they take into account and are heavily influenced by the media coverage. And media coverage is generally focused on the leader of the party. When people are voting they are essentially voting for the vision of that party as embodied in the leader.

nathanrees

Nathan Rees: Not a happy chappy

The leader dictates the direction in which the party moves. A good example is the turmoil surrounding the position of the Liberal Party on climate change and what to do about it. Under John Howard, the Liberals campaigned in the 2007 election with an ETS, now, under Tony Abbott, the party just voted one down and are crapping on about a “tax on everything”. It’s a complete about-face in position, with Malcolm Turnbull’s abrasive people skills and inability to negotiate effectively with his own party a large part of the problem.

So the Liberals changed their leader. I don’t have a problem with that at all. Personally, those two weeks of political drama was all very exciting, providing high quality entertainment on par with The West Wing and The Wire. As a party, the Liberals obviously needed to sort out what direction they were heading in, and begin to provide a consistent position which would appeal (in their minds at least) to voters. Parties need to change leaders to change direction and provide that figurehead who they hope will lead them to government.

But where I have a big problem is when a government changes their leader and we get a new Prime Minister or Premier, such as what happened last week in NSW. The NSW Labor Party changed leader, and direction, but the direction and leadership of Kristina K Keneally has been neither publicly elected nor endorsed. Neither, for that matter, was the person she replaced, Nathan Rees. Sure, you can argue that the people who put them in the top job are themselves publicly elected and so in their actions are the vestiges of their constituents, but I don’t think this justifies how easy it appears to be for a government to change leaders. Morris Iemma, the NSW Premier previous to Nathan Rees, was actually voted for by the people of NSW in the March 2007 election, but he himself became Premier two years before that, when Bob Carr retired. Each time the leader is changed we get someone we didn’t vote for in the top job.

Didn't vote for Morris either

Didn't vote for Morris either

Now if the policies and direction of a party, embodied in the person of the leader, become unpopular with the public, and the party sees that that in the next election the public might not want to vote for them, it’s only natural that they might want a new leader to lead them to the next election. All well and good. The American system of presidential pre-selection, for example, covers this quite well. But putting that person in the top job a year or two before the next election is a bit like cheating. Whether or not the government changes its direction to something the public approves of (and in NSW it’s arguable that each change of Premier has moved the government further away from public interest) there is the impression that this has happened, because the public embodiment of that direction has changed.

In the eyes of many voters, all the baggage the previous Premier carried is removed with that person, and the new Premier has a certain amount of time to distance themselves from that baggage, not necessarily by changing anything, but simply on the virtue of being new. Behind the scenes a government can continue with business as usual, and at the same time gaining ground over the opposition in the lead-up to the next election via the free publicity being premier provides. They get a nice little election slogan of ‘well, I’ve done alright so far, haven’t I? Give me a chance to show you what I can do,’ taking the kudos for any recent successes and popular decisions while blaming anything unpopular on the predecessor.

Bob Carr - the one we voted for

Bob Carr - the one we voted for

Whether this is going to work with a Kristina K Keneally led Labor Government in NSW is debatable. NSW Labor is a putrid rotten apple, spraying it with red paint isn’t going to make it edible. Whether a Liberal government in NSW would be any better is also up in the air. Personally I think that however bad the Liberals might be, Labor needs to be stopped from destroying NSW. It’s a shame not enough of the public regard the Greens as a viable alternative.

Obviously, a party has the right to change their leader. But when this happens while the party is in government, I personally think that on a successful leadership challenge, fresh public elections should immediately be called, regardless of how recent the last election was. In this way the government would be able to promote a platform of how the new leadership and direction government would benefit the people involved, and if the people approved of it, the party would retain government. But the way it works right now to me seems to be furthering corruption in the state and biasing elections towards the incumbent party.

Total Eclipse of the Heart Flowchart

Thought I’d share this flowchart of the lyrics to Bonnie Tyler’s Total Eclipse of the Heart.

6a00e0097e4e6888330120a676c1f8970b-800wi

I found it on the always entertaining ABC Arts Blog, Articulate , and they got it from internet newspaper the Huffington Post, which has a whole section of diagrams for songs. I like this Meatloaf one.

I was going to embed the film clip for this song, which I recall being VERY 80’s, and then I found this great video which is a literal video version. Funny stuff.

Naomi Klein on Copenhagen

naomi_kleinHave I mentioned before that I have a massive crush on Naomi Klein? It’s massively superficial. I’m just crazy for the ideas in her head and the way she puts them into sentences and paragraphs.

She’s written a couple of articles recently on the upcoming Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen.

The first one was originally published in Rolling Stone. For a left-leaning Green like myself it’s a bit of preaching to the converted, but also a better expression of the scope of the thing than I could manage. It’s a good introduction for those who are sympathetic but not fully up on it all. Fanatical fans of Uncle Kevin need to get an education. Those all the way to the Right should just stay there with the other deniers.

The second piece focuses more or the activism that’s likely to occur in Copenhagen.  I’m It’s starting to feel like Copenhagen will be the sequel to Seattle. Let’s hope it’s up there with The Empire Strikes or Aliens back in terms of quality sequels to quality originals.

Am I Still Single?

Over the last fortnight, a couple of people have asked me whether I’ve been dating someone. One comment was in relation to my infrequent recent blogging habits, surmising that I’d been neglecting that in favour of devoting more time to that special someone. This would be a fair enough excuse – it appears quite typical [...]

God’s Insecurity Complex

From time to time, I like to have discussions with religious people about their faith, be they Christian, Buddhist, Scientologist… I don’t discriminate. I find it a good way to examine my own beliefs, and given how religion has been such an important, some would argue integral, part of human development, it also helps me [...]

Black Hawks, Minstrels, and a losing war

Over the past couple of weeks I’ve been noticing that the government has been rolling out the propaganda machine for the armed forces and the war in Afghanistan.
Before the NRL Grand Final, a Black Hawk helicopter from the 6th Aviation regiment flew into the stadium, nodded its nose to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, turned three [...]

Does religion poison everything?

Last Friday night I attended the opening night of the Festival of Dangerous Ideas at the Sydney Opera House. The title of the talk was: Does Religion Poison Everything? and involved ABC journalist Tony Jones in conversation with writer and devout atheist Christopher Hitchens. It was a lot of fun.

If you don’t have time to [...]

Sex Degrees of Separation

http://calculators.lloydspharmacy.com/SexDegrees/